Game levels looks pretty cool, weapon design is also good, the idea that Duke can go around do some macho stuff as taking leak, playing pool, basketball, pinball and other "manly" activities. President is more often here than before. Wall boobs? What a hell? Your opponents returns as enhanced, more powerful than ever, I don't recall seeing any new one. In the 1996 game, it was simple, and it was obvious, and it was cool in controversial way. OK, it's not supposed to be taken serious, but they could have make him more richer and more developed character. He is loved by all people and they are all in shock and awe when they see him. He is one big egoistical jerk and you just don't feel connected to him. But, the humor is basically old and not that rich, also, the Duke's character is also pretty dry and outdated. John is still here as Duke, well they kept that element right and he did a good job as always. You are just not that happy to go back to it. I heard that PC version is better than XBOX or Playstation. You are really easy target, and you are pretty easy to kill, or to get hit, no matter the difficulty. Duke could be more agile, but here, he is just clumsy, he is stiff as a board, you can barely move! You really get your butt kicked on multiple occasions and when your, here I dare say it "ego" is low, you don't have a medpack and you can't move. Why do I feel that they spiced it up with the reality in a way? The game play could be much more better. I think that they were trying to imitate Halo. Why? Why driving and carrying two weapons. The new thing is that Duke can drive a car. Other ideas were taken from the 1996 game and just enhance it. But still, the old look for medkit idea was better. So, instead to look for medkits around you look for some "manly" stuff to boost Duke's ego. Graphics were good, but not that great, some of the ideas where Duke can interact with other objects like in mini-games to upgrade your health. here it is, a FPS Duke Nukem with new 2010 graphics, I thought, let's take a look at it, why not.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |